Thanks Jason!! Clearly others, such as yourself, have exerted more effort than I in creating proposals, etc. I only hope to help in whatever way possible. Feel free to interject, but a tentative plan to move forward might look something like:
1) Gather momentum and get a few dedicated people on board 2) Analyze/review potential integration points and agree on the initial scope of the library 3) Gather/modify/normalize existing/proposed components 4) Implement additional components within the initial scope 5) Provide a roadmap for enhancements taking into consideration changes to the ZF and Doctrine I'm assuming that you've gone through the process of signing the CLA, etc? I have not and so would need to review this information and go through the necessary process. Thanks again for the feedback. Let me know if you have any other recommendations, ideas, etc. Jasone wrote: > > I am able, and have the time, to do this. I authored two of those > proposals. Been waiting on the zend team :) > > (Or now that I look, maybe they're not moved to "ready for review" yet?) > > > Jason > > > On May 8, 2009 6:16pm, Matthew Lurz <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> !!! Calling All Doctrine/ZF Users !!! > > > >> While the ZF wiki contains several Doctrine related proposals, there >> doesn't > >> seem to exist a cohesive movement toward tying together these 2 excellent > >> pieces of software. With the benefits of doing so being so great, let's >> band > >> together for this purpose! > > > >> If you are a potential recipient of these benefits, would you be >> interested > >> in > >> using or contributing to the development of such an integration library? > > > >> If so, read on and reply.. > > > >> A brief survey of potential integration points (1) turned up: > > > >> ZendX_Doctrine_Application_Resource_Manager (2) > > > >> ZendX_Doctrine_Tool_Framework_Client > > > >> ZendX_Doctrine_Log_Writer_Table > > > >> ZendX_Doctrine_Session_SaveHandler_Table > > > >> ZendX_Doctrine_Auth_Adapter_Table (3) > > > >> ZendX_Doctrine_Paginator_Adapter_Collection (3) > > > >> ZendX_Doctrine_CodeGenerator_Form (3) > > > >> --- > > > >> It wasn't my intent to define scope or vision, but the general intent of > >> each > >> should be somewhat self-evident. > > > >> Integration points moving in the other direction exist as well. I've yet >> to > >> evaluate these relationships, but one possibility is Doctrine event > >> listeners > >> using Zend_Log for profiling, debugging, etc. > > > >> Have I missed any potential integration points? Any other comments? > > > >> 1) ZendX_Doctrine is the proposed namespace > >> 2) I have some very basic, working code if anyone is interested > >> 3) Proposal exists on ZF wiki > >> -- > >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-ZendX_Doctrine-tp23454552p23454552.html > >> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-ZendX_Doctrine-tp23454552p23455034.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
