I'm an avid user of both ZF and Doctrine. Time is short on my end but I can help here and there. Two things I've done with ZF & Doctrine is merge Doctrine with Lucene Search w/ Doctrine listeners that update the index on save/insert/delete. I've also merged Doctrine with Zend_Amf to allow remoting to interact right with the ORM layer. There are a lot of other possible touch points like, Zend_Navigation - Zend_Acl - etc.. where we could merge the two frameworks.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Matthew Lurz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Jason!! > > Clearly others, such as yourself, have exerted more effort than I in > creating proposals, etc. I only hope to help in whatever way possible. Feel > free to interject, but a tentative plan to move forward might look something > like: > > 1) Gather momentum and get a few dedicated people on board > > 2) Analyze/review potential integration points and agree on the initial > scope of the library > > 3) Gather/modify/normalize existing/proposed components > > 4) Implement additional components within the initial scope > > 5) Provide a roadmap for enhancements taking into consideration changes to > the ZF and Doctrine > > I'm assuming that you've gone through the process of signing the CLA, etc? I > have not and so would need to review this information and go through the > necessary process. > > Thanks again for the feedback. Let me know if you have any other > recommendations, ideas, etc. > > > Jasone wrote: >> >> I am able, and have the time, to do this. I authored two of those >> proposals. Been waiting on the zend team :) >> >> (Or now that I look, maybe they're not moved to "ready for review" yet?) >> >> >> Jason >> >> >> On May 8, 2009 6:16pm, Matthew Lurz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> !!! Calling All Doctrine/ZF Users !!! >> >> >> >>> While the ZF wiki contains several Doctrine related proposals, there >>> doesn't >> >>> seem to exist a cohesive movement toward tying together these 2 excellent >> >>> pieces of software. With the benefits of doing so being so great, let's >>> band >> >>> together for this purpose! >> >> >> >>> If you are a potential recipient of these benefits, would you be >>> interested >> >>> in >> >>> using or contributing to the development of such an integration library? >> >> >> >>> If so, read on and reply.. >> >> >> >>> A brief survey of potential integration points (1) turned up: >> >> >> >>> ZendX_Doctrine_Application_Resource_Manager (2) >> >> >> >>> ZendX_Doctrine_Tool_Framework_Client >> >> >> >>> ZendX_Doctrine_Log_Writer_Table >> >> >> >>> ZendX_Doctrine_Session_SaveHandler_Table >> >> >> >>> ZendX_Doctrine_Auth_Adapter_Table (3) >> >> >> >>> ZendX_Doctrine_Paginator_Adapter_Collection (3) >> >> >> >>> ZendX_Doctrine_CodeGenerator_Form (3) >> >> >> >>> --- >> >> >> >>> It wasn't my intent to define scope or vision, but the general intent of >> >>> each >> >>> should be somewhat self-evident. >> >> >> >>> Integration points moving in the other direction exist as well. I've yet >>> to >> >>> evaluate these relationships, but one possibility is Doctrine event >> >>> listeners >> >>> using Zend_Log for profiling, debugging, etc. >> >> >> >>> Have I missed any potential integration points? Any other comments? >> >> >> >>> 1) ZendX_Doctrine is the proposed namespace >> >>> 2) I have some very basic, working code if anyone is interested >> >>> 3) Proposal exists on ZF wiki >> >>> -- >> >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-ZendX_Doctrine-tp23454552p23454552.html >> >>> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-ZendX_Doctrine-tp23454552p23455034.html > Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
