On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:47:05AM -0400, Clinton A . Pierce wrote:
> for(0..20) { push(@r, int rand(50)) }
Followup to myself, the result of this is entirely dependant on how
the list is created. The problem, it seems, is in the
newSViv(a>b?1:-1)
statement. It was a poor choice to find relative positions within the
list. Heh. Sorry 'bout that. :)
--
Clinton A. Pierce Teach Yourself Perl in 24 Hours *and*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Perl Developer's Dictionary
"If you rush a Miracle Man, for details, see http://geeksalad.org
you get rotten Miracles." --Miracle Max, The Princess Bride
- Sorting in-place Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place Craig S . Cottingham
- Re: Sorting in-place Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place Craig S . Cottingham
- Re: Sorting in-place Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further m... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, furth... Ronald J Kimball
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, f... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, furth... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place, still a wish *... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, f... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? ... Bart Lateur
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (S... Abigail
