On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +0200, Abigail wrote:
> This approach is never going to work.
You're right, but what harm could it have been to look? :)
> - and you will have a sort that runs in linear time!
And that's not all bad, is it? <big grin>
--
Clinton A. Pierce Teach Yourself Perl in 24 Hours *and*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Perl Developer's Dictionary
"If you rush a Miracle Man, for details, see http://geeksalad.org
you get rotten Miracles." --Miracle Max, The Princess Bride
- Re: Sorting in-place Craig S . Cottingham
- Re: Sorting in-place Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place Craig S . Cottingham
- Re: Sorting in-place Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further myste... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further m... Ronald J Kimball
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, furth... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further m... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, furth... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, furth... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, f... Bart Lateur
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? ... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? ... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sorting in-place pcg
- Re: Sorting in-place Ronald J Kimball
