On 27 Jul 01, at 0:46, Abigail wrote: > ...If you > would then swap pairs, Perl will think the entire array is already > monotonic - and you will have a sort that runs in linear time! And what's wrong with that? I tell my friends all the time that Perl is the best, and this would be clear evidence of its superiority over those other, pedestrian programming languages... /Bernie\ -- Bernie Cosell Roanoke Electronic Village mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Roanoke, VA
- Re: Sorting in-place Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place Craig S . Cottingham
- Re: Sorting in-place Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further myste... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further m... Ronald J Kimball
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, furth... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further m... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place, still a wish *sigh... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, furth... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, f... Bart Lateur
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? ... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? ... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVE... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sorting in-place pcg
- Re: Sorting in-place Ronald J Kimball
