On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:36:33AM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
> >And what's wrong with that?
> [..]
> I'm not really sure if you are serious, or just jesting.
If I was completely serious about building fanciful engines to solve the
world's software troubles and end world hunger I would have posted to
one of the Perl-6 Lists.
But this is Fun With Perl.
--
Clinton A. Pierce Teach Yourself Perl in 24 Hours *and*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Perl Developer's Dictionary
"If you rush a Miracle Man, for details, see http://geeksalad.org
you get rotten Miracles." --Miracle Max, The Princess Bride
- Re: Sorting in-place Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further mysteri... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place? (Whoops!) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further mys... Ronald J Kimball
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further mys... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place, still a wish *sigh* Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, further... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No, fur... Bart Lateur
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No... Clinton A . Pierce
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED? No... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED?... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED?... Bernie Cosell
- Re: Sorting in-place (SOLVED?... Abigail
- Re: Sorting in-place Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sorting in-place pcg
- Re: Sorting in-place Ronald J Kimball
- Re: Sorting in-place pcg
- Re: Sorting in-place Ronald J Kimball
- Re: Sorting in-place Clinton A . Pierce
