Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's really stumping me is that there has to be a shorter solution for
> wc.pl (mine is 23), but I haven't been able to get past the need for printf
> (at least, not for a shorter solution). Has anyone managed to do it without
> it?
Gah! You've obviously got the same one as Eugene. My current best on
that hole is 26...
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
