Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> What's really stumping me is that there has to be a shorter solution for
>> wc.pl (mine is 23), but I haven't been able to get past the need for printf
>> (at least, not for a shorter solution). Has anyone managed to do it without
>> it?
>
> Gah! You've obviously got the same one as Eugene. My current best on
> that hole is 26...
Forget I said that. I'm down to 21 on that hole, either with or
without printf. Got it mixed up with mid.pl
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
