BooK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> En r�ponse � Brad Greenlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> What's really stumping me is that there has to be a shorter solution
for
>> wc.pl (mine is 23), but I haven't been able to get past the need for
>> printf (at least, not for a shorter solution). Has anyone managed to do
>> it
without it?
>
> My wc.pl is 21, but uses printf. I tried many things to get rid of printf,
> but all of them ended up being longer...
There is a possible 21 char version that doesn't use printf. But it
does use switch magic.
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
