----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen Goranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Megillot] J. Post on Qumran (problematic)


[snip]
>
> And some of us may venture to suggest that the Qumran 900 or so ms remains
are
> more significant than that clay.
>
> Stephen Goranson


Where the 900 mss perhaps found in the pool? or the site?
There is absolutely no reson to connect the scrolls with the site.
But I see that only a few here have watched the movie clip on Zangenberg's
excavation of 2003/4. One has to be a fool to separate the texts from the
site, as Hanan Eshel states in the clip, if memory serves. Perhaps, perhaps
not. The true question is: who is the greater fool; only history will tell
us - but this already soon...

_Dierk



_______________________________________________
g-Megillot mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.McMaster.CA/mailman/listinfo/g-megillot

Reply via email to