Chuck writes,

<"deliberately unblessed' ?????  I've never heard of doing that for  
any reason.

The OS9 installations are 'blessed' as a part of the installation  
process. No special effort needed.>

Which is what I thought too! 

<The having 2 instances of 'OS9 installation' doesn't cause any  
problems. The hardware will only use one at a time, you may get to  
choose, you may not, I don't know the 'built in' rules for choosing  
an OS9 instance when there is more than one available and the  
hardware is just looking for 'a' OS9 system.

In OSX System Preferences, choosing a OS9 system points the OSX  
system there for running classic. [As I understand it, OSX then makes  
some 'minor ?' changes to the OS9 system. But these changes are  
supposedly benign as far as running OS9 directly is concerned.]

I believe that an opt/alt startup would allow access to both OS9  
instances, never tried it, so I don't know.>

1. Okay. I have to reiterate my admission of being slightly confused at 
the part of dc's suggestion that I should have TWO OS 9s installed on my 
G4, one to run Classic with and one for booting/running OS 9. I learned 
about folders having to be blessed to be bootable way before I even had 
OS X, and simply installing the OS itself (7.x.x, 8.x.x, 9.x.x), from 
floppy or CD whichever applicable, would result in an automatically 
blessed System Folder which would boot the Mac you installed it on -- and 
that was my primary experience with Mac OS installations. The blessing 
business I learned about in conjunction with the idea of COPYING a System 
Folder from one Mac (or HD) to another -- you'd have to bless the copied 
one yourself to make that Mac or HD bootable (for a time I had two HDs in 
my Beige, but that was in the last year of having the Beige before 
getting the G4).

2. Yes, choosing an OS 9 System Folder from OS X's System Preferences 
does make changes to that System Folder -- when you do it, OS X asks you 
to "update." Update what specifically, I don't know, but apparently it 
has to do something with running Classic. However, I have no idea what 
making an OS 9 System Folder able to run Classic does to render that same 
System Folder unable to boot and run OS 9, especially when it's on a 
different HD from the OS X install, because:

For two years, the OS 9 System Folder on my 9 HD DID run Classic while I 
was in Tiger, and ALSO booted and ran straight-up OS 9 when I did the 
Option-Restart and selected the HD 9 was on -- once I did what I thought 
was a clean install of OS 9 ("cleaning up" after the Beige). It's only 
recently that this nice little dual bootability went south on me.

~Yersinia.

________

"When you move something to a more logical place, you can only remember 
where it used to be and your decision to move it."


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to