On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Luobin Yang <yangl...@isu.edu> wrote:
> Hi, Peter,
> What difficulties did you see to include psi-blast and phi-blast when you
> were working on the other programs in the NCBI+ suite? I would be interested
> in creating a tool configuration file for each of these two.
> Thanks,
> Luobin

Hi Luobin,

At first glance, the binaries for psiblast, rpsblast, and rpstblastn don't
look too different for wrapping. We would need to define a third loc
file for the RPS BLAST domain databases (like the existing loc files
for nucleotide and protein databases).

However, I'm not immediately sure where phi-blast existing with the
standalone NCBI BLAST+ tools. Do you know?

Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:


Reply via email to