On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John Chilton <chil...@msi.umn.edu> wrote: > I agree that we shouldn't be hasty, but my two cents is that the > galaxy-dev list should be split in two. Ironically, I think most of > the traffic on this list right now is related to deployment issues - > in that respect I would see it almost as Galaxy admins stay here and > developer chatter move to a new list. (This could hopefully be > accomplished with e-mail aliases or something).
I think it would be simpler to define the new list and encourage people only interested in deployment to move to the new list, but I'm not looking after mailman here ;) > The nature of my interactions with Galaxy is such that I would still > follow both lists, but I know there are people out there who have > Galaxy deployed but don't really do any development per se, and I have > talked to at least one such person who told me he does not follow this > list because there is too much traffic. I don't think these people > need to see my thoughts on a syntax for securing tool XML files or > Peter's thoughts on the tool shed. > > Long story short, I love the sound of my own voice and I would be less > self conscious about that if there were two lists :). > > -John Likewise if the list was split, I'd follow both galaxy-dev and the new one what ever it was called (how about galaxy-deploy, since galaxy-admin sounds too much like it is about the project management), and also galaxy-user too most likely ;) Peter ___________________________________________________________ Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all" in your mail client. To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/ To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at: http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/