On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:26:00 +0000
"Kandalaft, Iyad" <iyad.kandal...@agr.gc.ca> wrote:

> As a supplement to Oksana's original inquiry, we, at AAFC, couple
> Galaxy to SGE  and possibly a different grid engine in the future for
> job scheduling.  The old-fashioned way of doing that is to unify
> storage path and UID/GID between the application server and cluster.

I am starting to warm of the idea of making a small web interface that
asks for a few configuration options:
1. type of grid engine
2. desired docker/galaxy flavour (RNA, exome, WGS, ...)
3. ... (e.g. intial admin user and password)

and would pull Björn's relevant Dockerfile, patch it and generate a new
one, tailored to the need of the user.

I think it is impossible to have a set of dockerfiles for all the
desired configurations (think analysis flavours times number of cluster
types - for example).

I will need to implement something like this very soon, and I would not
mind to do it in a way that the community could reuse...

So comments would be appreciated...
Please keep all replies on the list by using "reply all"
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:

Reply via email to