I see the truth of all that Tom, however as you said yourself, i don't think Mota is a particularly typical testing process at all for games.

Even apart from the pretty major money issue you mention, there was the fact that the original alchemy game had features x y z, that you then produced your own game which got shot down by the evil lawyers of doom, and now we're onto a third project under the same banner but essentially a different game.

When i think of all the Monti and mota versions i've played, features have gone in and out like nobody's business due to all these changes.

I think if Monti had just been firmly and squarely released as it should have been, all these shinanigans would've sorted themselves out.

Hopefully any games Philip, yourself, or indeed anybody else developes in future will be free of all these swings and roundabouts.

Beware the grue!


Gamers mailing list __ Gamers@audyssey.org
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to gamers-unsubscr...@audyssey.org.
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to gamers-ow...@audyssey.org.

Reply via email to