Hi Denis.
that makes distinct economic sense, however remember when we're dealing with
disability we've gone beyond the realms of economics. As Tom said earlier,
thanks to Us law, access has to be a component in governmental systems.
So long as you have a belief that there is a principle that overrides
prophit, the prophit arguement alone doesn't stand. just as we have labour
laws, and (in the Uk anyway), laws about national health which are socially
motivated rather than purely based on capitalistic principles, so is the
idea of effort and equal access, ---- indeed Tom illustrated this earlier
with the us law requiring software access.
Of course this isn't to say the world should bend over backwards, indeed
that's one of the main pricniples of my thesis, merely though that if you
are going to considder disability it should be considdered not as a minority
group access, but as access to a condition which will affect most people at
some point to some degree.
Beware the Grue!
Dark.
---
Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected].
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to [email protected].
