well I have a certifficate in radio broadcast from a local coledge I
don't have every bit of equipment but if I had audio files of people
reviewing things that would be fine I guess.
ofcause the issue would be if I had to do anything crazy,
so maybe not for me.
but yeah when things come.
At 05:59 PM 3/7/2013, you wrote:
Hi Shaun,
Regarding podcasts etc we can discuss that once the new website is up
and running. However, if we are going to do it we need a decent show
host to do the podcast. Not everyone is necessarily qualified for that
position and as with any kind of public media it takes the right kind
of person to do it properly not to mention the right kind of equipment
etc.
For example, I have listened to a number of amateur podcasts where the
person throws in a number of "oh" and "um" and "uh" every few minutes
which is absolutely irritating. All of that can be edited out of
course, but few amateur podcasters take the time to get a nice
professional cast by editing out all the extra garbage. So if we went
with a podcast I would hope we could find plenty of people willing to
do editing and post production to get a high quality and professional
cast rather than something produced by someone's $10.00 PC microphone
and a sound recording program.
Cheers!
On 3/6/13, shaun everiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> on the note of change though this may disadvantage a relitive few, I
> want to put foreward the thought about putting audyssey mag to be in
> a podcast form of a sort.
> There are several reasons.
> firstly we have 1 central editor, ron doing everything.
> That was fine with a central editer with disks and even in the early
> days of the net but as I found myself offline life and other junk in
> general gets me to not be able to complete all things I wanted.
> unless I focus on it soly for example yesterday I took down the
> entire network for a virus scan and image backup.
> I killed several viruses in the backup drives and imaged 2 units but
> it took roughly 24 hours to do it and I didn't do anything in fact
> most of it was done while I was sleeping.
> Another point.
> why bother about audyssey.org at all, we have the audiogames forum
> for just about everything.
> I respected the mag, it was good.
> when mike fair did it, but most of the goodness was before the net.
> in the year 1995 that changed slowly but surely.
> Sadly not to many articles come out .
> The magazine is prity much crap and junk and stupid now.
> I stress that its crappyness is not its fault, its just its not been
> upgraded in ages probably since it came online.
> A lot of news is in the forum more update sometimes than the news the
> devs send and they hardly send anything out these days its all slowed
> down.
> Even the opensource hackers have slowed. its not as good as it was
> pickings are slim, etc.
> We probably should upgrade it to some sort of cast on different
> reviews including game demos and playthroughs etc, I can't do
> everything but thanks to a little dosh required to get my system to a
> level where I can broadcast off it to tbrn on a cohosting role I have
> a adaquit microphone setup, ofcause I can't record game reviews and
> recordings at the same time without it sounding from an outside
> pospective but still,it could be something to do.
> I realise that not everyone will a appreciate this especially those
> on dialup but I feel that a sofficient number of people are on
> broadband sertainly enough to justify the upgrade.
> On the other hand stopping audyssey and switching it back to google
> groups and not having the mag is fine.
> If text is still what people want the only other way to do it is
> reduce the format, there used to be a letters sections a reviews
> section, a dnd section sometimes an imortal gamer section and a dev
> news section.
> The game adventure stuff with the imortal gamer and or game rescue
> unit really grabs me so if thats left in fine.
> the letters are most emails from the list so should go.
> the dev news should go unless devs want to post their junk at the mag.
> the dnd section should stay.
> reviews and casts are on the forums but I guess some for stuff not
> reviewed before can go there.
> the articles can stay to.
> Also I think that 1. either we have a shorter publication time to
> publish or just pile everything in every 6 months or something.
> I can't even remember the last issue I think I glanced over the last
> few without much interest.
> the first 20-30 were the best but with the net thats prity
> much moved focus of tech and junk away from the old text mag.
> The other thing is, how much is actually out there.
> most of it we know bar vary few things that are not coman.
>
---
Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected].
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to [email protected].
---
Gamers mailing list __ [email protected]
If you want to leave the list, send E-mail to [email protected].
You can make changes or update your subscription via the web, at
http://mail.audyssey.org/mailman/listinfo/gamers_audyssey.org.
All messages are archived and can be searched and read at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected].
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the management of the list,
please send E-mail to [email protected].
