Hi Erich, --- Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I'd prefer to change this by patching the llist.h of Ganglia. Does > anybody have objections to this? Before fixing things either way, we should take a closer look. Could you show us the offending difference between the two versions? I made some changes over a year ago. Those were just cosmetic and did not change the order. > Over the long term it would make sense to either build ganglia with > libe or > maybe even integrate libe into ganglia and produce the libe RPM when > building > ganglia. I saw that gexec is also integrated into the ganglia SVN > tree: is > this now the main development tree for gexec? > Integrating gexec/libe into standard ganglia builds sounds good to me. As for the "main development tree gexec" question - what development? Last changes have been over two years ago. And I think it has been broken since then. Cheers Martin ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de
