Hi Erich,
--- Erich Focht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Monday 27 November 2006 12:53, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd prefer to change this by patching the llist.h of Ganglia.
> Does
> > > anybody have objections to this?
> >
> > Before fixing things either way, we should take a closer look.
> Could
> > you show us the offending difference between the two versions? I
> made
> > some changes over a year ago. Those were just cosmetic and did not
> > change the order.
>
> Ganglia has in lib/llist.h:
>
> typedef struct _llist_entry {
> void *val; /* Entry value */
> struct _llist_entry *prev; /* Previous entry on list */
> struct _llist_entry *next; /* Next entry on list */
> } llist_entry;
>
> while the original libe package llist.h is:
>
> typedef struct _llist_entry {
> struct _llist_entry *prev; /* Previous entry on list */
> struct _llist_entry *next; /* Next entry on list */
> void *val; /* Entry value */
> } llist_entry;
>
>
the "libe" version looks more textbook like. I think we should take it
:-)
Martin
------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch
email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de
www: http://www.knobisoft.de