On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:45:27 +0100, Ken wrote in message <[email protected]>:
> Thanks Arnt > > "..the Swedish audio here tells us _nothing_ new we can use, > it starts with "charcoal gas is dirty and is compressed in > torpedo like bottles" while "wood gas is good, clean, cheap, > easy" etc" > > That explains the high pressure gas bottles. Charcoal gas would have > little N2 content, allowing a more practical compression. ..which part of "_useless_ propaganda drivel" did you miss? ;oD ..just like most of today's media shills, this voiceover guy has precisely _no_ idea what he's babbling about. ..the steel bottles are acetylene bottles. ;o) You know, high pressure "welding gas." ;o) > Charcoal gas, effectively similar to coal gas or "town gas" would be > made in a central gas works and then compressed for vehicle use. .."would", is the operative word here, and it _would_ have to assume WWII Sweden could afford fighting WWII against both the Soviet Union and the 3'rd Reich on bottled charcoal gas. ;o) > If it were being centrally made, I'm not sure why it would be dirty? > > Of course these guys have forgotten more than we will ever know! > > Great video all the same. ..if you're talking about the 2 minute mid section from the engineering shop to the bus towing its gasifier trailer, I agree. ;o) > > > Ken -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Gasification mailing list [email protected] http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org http://gasifiers.bioenergylists.org http://info.bioenergylists.org UNSUBSCRIBE HERE; http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/gasification_listserv.repp.org
