Henri & Mark, here I go again! In any practical design utilising the minimum of labour, batch drying doesn't come into the picture. The wood slowly falls down a vertical hopper and you keep adding at the top as much as you take out the bottom.. That is the basics of counter current flow and instead of a front of moisture moving up the bed, the whole moisture senario is vertually static up the hopper and it is the wood that moves. And it is the rate that the wood moves that controls the amount that is burnt and the heat into the system So, in my daisy chain is virtually self controlling with the amount of heat, rather than relative humidity and air conditioning principles, that is the operating force. . And can I say it again there IS a pressure differencial through a hopper tightly packed with small regular blocks of wood. and that pressure, if you work your system right, will drive a column of steam out the top of the hopper. When you put in wet wood as feed stock, sure there is lots of water but that water is rapidly reduced to that which trapped in the wood structure and can only slowly pass out accross a temperature differencial within the wood blocks. Now in terms of distillation, what we got out of the bottom of our exhaust fired wood drying hopper was 'Torrified' wood. As well as being friable it was also coloured a dark brown and as I said you could light it with a single match. And if you want to know about toffification look up Tom Miles' archives. And Mark, you don't get to..torrification with wet steam! Or even saturated steam! By the time the wood is near the bottom of the hopper, in counter current flow, its hot HOT and all your HVAC stuff does not apply! Ken C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henri Naths" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Drying fuel with IC exhaust and otherpleasures...


Hi Mark
you wrote
<Saturated, but cooled, exhaust gas and some
<evaporant would exit the hopper but it would not be a good design because
<the upper layers of fuel would experience very little heat transfer. The
<stratum where actual drying would be occurring would slowly move upwards in
<the fuel bed.

<I am just trying to sort-out the heat exchange mechanisms
<involved in order to make suitable design decisions

The feed stock drying and supply can be calibrated to the demand. Much like the atomizing of petrol in an ic...
Henri
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Ludlow" <[email protected]> To: "'Ken Calvert'" <[email protected]>; "'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 3:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Drying fuel with IC exhaust and otherpleasures...


Got it, Ken! But I'd like to point out that without a pressure differential (as in a multiple-effect evaporation system) that the daisy-chain that you describe is impossible. Saturated steam exiting a nozzle, for instance, will
create a local zone where the steam is superheated, but once it is fully
expanded it becomes saturated. One can't generate a pound of steam, which,
in turn, creates another pound of steam ad infinitum. I think that's a
Second Law violation.

Water is virtually the only condensable gas in an exhaust stream, as far as
I am aware. Certainly there is no restriction on the exhaust gas
transferring its sensible heat to the wood and to the water vapor, but
there's plenty of room to 'expand' in a hopper that is not a pressure
vessel. The example that you give of a teakettle is not apt. Water vapor
becomes visible at the spout of a teakettle because the vapor is cooled by
the surrounding air and condenses into visible droplets. Once it is mixed
with the surrounding air, the vapor disappears, as you will observe, but
only if the surrounding air is has capacity for more water. Entropy
increases and the combination of water vapor and air that results has much
less utility.

I am not asserting that woodgas IC exhaust will not dry wood. I am claiming
that it will do so only until the point where the partial pressure of the
water in the exhaust gas does not exceed that at the surface of the wet
fuel. If one had a very, very deep hopper, the moisture from lower levels of fuel would condense in upper levels and migrate back down toward the drying zone, essentially putting the dryer in reflux mode (operating much the same as a packed column evaporator). Saturated, but cooled, exhaust gas and some
evaporant would exit the hopper but it would not be a good design because
the upper layers of fuel would experience very little heat transfer. The
stratum where actual drying would be occurring would slowly move upwards in
the fuel bed.

We are all aware of the sensitivity of woodgas quality to moisture content
of fuel. When setting out to design the 'perfect' woodgas IC system,
recuperating exhaust heat for use in fuel drying is obviously very
desirable. I am just trying to sort-out the heat exchange mechanisms
involved in order to make suitable design decisions. Most decisions hinge on
the characteristics of the exhaust gas itself, as it exits the IC engine
under normal operating conditions.

Thank you for your insights.

Best, Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Calvert [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 1:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Drying fuel with IC exhaust and other
pleasures...

No Mark I am saying that running an engine on producer gas has a lot less
moisture than on petrol. And I am saying that hot exhaust gas has so much
excess heat that it will boil off water as steam and and as long as that
steam is moving through the wood it will boil off more steam until the
temperature drops to the point where psychrometrics apply, and generally,
if you have ever seen the steam condensing above a hopper of wet wood, or
watched the spout of a boiling kettle, that only happens after it has left
the confined drying zone and had room to expand.    Ken C.


--- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Ludlow" <[email protected]>
To: "'Ken Calvert'" <[email protected]>; "'Discussion of biomass
pyrolysis and gasification'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 9:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Gasification] Drying fuel with IC exhaust and other
pleasures...


Hi Ken,
Not to flog this horse(power) to death, but are you saying that the
combustion chemistry (and composition of the exhaust gas) is substantially different at idle than when an engine is running higher up its horsepower
curve? I fully realize that the heat flux would be greater. But
intuitively,
it seems as if when a load were placed on a normally aspirated, running
engine, disproportionately more fuel would be required and thus there
would
be more products of combustion--including water--by design. Carbureted
engines used to run pretty rich at idle, but ECMs have addressed that
issue
for the most part on fuel injected powerplants. I realize that this may
have
little to do with fueling with biogas!

Modern industrial tunnel dryers are often counter-flow; the driest product
comes in contact with the driest (lowest RH) air and this air, in turn,
'preheats' the new product coming into the dryer, principally through
surface condensation, i.e. latent heat transfer. Efficiency is at its
highest when the exhaust is saturated. This is the principle behind 93%+
eff. Furnaces and water heaters. This is a quite different scenario from a
packed-bed arrangement where the feedstock closest to the engine dries
much
sooner than higher layers. Once dry, it serves no useful function in the
feed bed and is responsible for much of the pressure drop through the
dryer.
A live-bottom hopper/dryer would address this, I suppose.

If anyone has any dewpoint measurements of IC exhaust gases under various load conditions in a woodgas-fueled engine, I would be very interested in
having these data. I am too lazy to crank the numbers on this one!

Very best regards, Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Calvert [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 11:29 PM
To: [email protected]; Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Drying fuel with IC exhause and
otherpleasures...

Mark, sure you can  watch the condensation from an engine ticking over,
and

which you have probably just started, but I challenge you to bore a hole
in
the floor of your car and point a IR beam thermometer down on the exhaust
pipe when you are doing  >80mph.   You wouldn't be worrying about
relative
humidity then.
Its apples with apples, not  iceblocks out of the frig!
Ken C.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Ludlow" <[email protected]>
To: "'Guag Meister'" <[email protected]>; "'Discussion of biomass
pyrolysis and gasification'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Drying fuel with IC exhause and
otherpleasures...


You are right in a way, Peter. But the water has to leave the wood, yes?
Where will it go if the surrounding atmosphere is saturated with water?

Let me illustrate with an extreme example: Try drying wood at, say, 110C
in
a pressure cooker, with the wood covered with water.

If the exhaust gas has room for the vapor phase of water, the water will
be
carried away; if it does not (if it is already near its dewpoint), the
gas
will become supersaturated and nucleate condensation will occur. There
will
be rain in the forecast.

I held my hand to the exhaust pipe of my 3.6-l automobile while it was
idling. It was not scorchingly hot but it was palpably humid. Not exactly
Science, I admit.

Best, Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Guag Meister [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 4:48 PM
To: 'doug.williams'; 'Discussion of biomass pyrolysis and gasification';
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [Gasification] Drying fuel with IC exhause and other
pleasures...

Hi Mark ;

This is true, but 100C is a special case because the water can exist as
both
a liquid and gas. If we discuss a slightly higher temperature, it may be
clearer.  If you heat wet wood to 105C by any means, all the water
present
in the wood will be a gas.  Yes it will be in equilibrium, but since
water
as a gas occupies 100x more volume than water as a liquid, you will have
succeeded in driving off 99% of the water.   You could even do the
heating
with saturated steam and it would still work.

Please correct me if there are any errors in the logic.

Best Regards,
Peter G. (armchair gasifierist)
Thailand
www.gac-seeds.com


--- On Sat, 12/18/10, Mark Ludlow <[email protected]> wrote:
If the IC exhaust is saturated at
100C, the best the wood can do is reach an
equilibrium moisture content with respect to this
environment.








_______________________________________________
The Gasification list has moved to
[email protected] - please update your email contacts to
reflect the change.
Please visit http://info.bioenergylists.org for more news on the list
move.
Thank you,
Gasification Administrator








_______________________________________________
The Gasification list has moved to
[email protected] - please update your email contacts to reflect the change. Please visit http://info.bioenergylists.org for more news on the list move.
Thank you,
Gasification Administrator

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5716 (20101219) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com





_______________________________________________
The Gasification list has moved to
[email protected] - please update your email contacts to reflect the change. Please visit http://info.bioenergylists.org for more news on the list move.
Thank you,
Gasification Administrator



_______________________________________________
The Gasification list has moved to
[email protected] - please update your email contacts to reflect 
the change.
Please visit http://info.bioenergylists.org for more news on the list move.
Thank you,
Gasification Administrator

Reply via email to