2011/5/27 5:49 -0700, jye...@java.net: > I would like to propose the following changes.
Thanks for your feedback. > Section 9 > Meetings > "Private Meetings" shall not have non-public votes. The privacy of the meeting > may be used to discuss topics which do not require votes as otherwise noted in > the document. I'll add this to the list of changes to be considered by the Board. > Votes > 1. Add specificity to the definition of a quorate instead of "a majority of > its > members" What was intended is "simple majority", i.e., more present than absent. I'll clarify that. > 2. All votes should be publicly available. If a vote is held, it should not be > done in a "Private Session". This should promote more transparency. This is essentially the same, I think, as your first suggestion. - Mark
