https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128162
--- Comment #2 from Li Pan <pan2.li at intel dot com> --- (In reply to Li Pan from comment #1) > Ack, it looks like the different-source-EEW rule things. > > Similar to this issue which confirmed by Waterman for reduction. > > https://github.com/intel-restricted/applications.binary.translator.ibt- > sources/pull/7604 > > But I am not very sure the rule still apply for wmacc related insns include > the float. I test the binary on K1, it has no sigill(it doesn't mean this > is the right). > > Could Waterman help to double confirm about this? Thanks a lot. wrong link, take this one https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues/2350 --- Comment #3 from Li Pan <pan2.li at intel dot com> --- (In reply to Li Pan from comment #1) > Ack, it looks like the different-source-EEW rule things. > > Similar to this issue which confirmed by Waterman for reduction. > > https://github.com/intel-restricted/applications.binary.translator.ibt- > sources/pull/7604 > > But I am not very sure the rule still apply for wmacc related insns include > the float. I test the binary on K1, it has no sigill(it doesn't mean this > is the right). > > Could Waterman help to double confirm about this? Thanks a lot. wrong link, take this one https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues/2350
