Hi Steve,
Can you please add a testcase? The patch looks fine.
I cannot approve it though. 

Mike, can you please approve this patch?

Regards,
Surya

On 18/05/26 3:08 AM, Steve Markgraf wrote:
> The MPC8xx PowerQUICC family only implements full 'sync', 'lwsync'
> is not yet supported, same situation as for E500 cores.
> 
> Fix emitting 'lwsync' instructions by adding PROCESSOR_MPCCORE
> to the TARGET_NO_LWSYNC define.
> 
> Encountered an illegal instruction crash (in libstdc++ atomics) and
> verified the fix on actual MPC860 hardware.
> 
> Minimal test:
> 
>   $ cat test.c
>   #include <stdatomic.h>
>   atomic_int counter;
>   void store_release(int val) {
>       atomic_store_explicit(&counter, val, memory_order_release);
>   }
> 
>   $ powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -mcpu=860 -msoft-float -O2 -S -o- test.c | grep sync
>   lwsync     <-- should be sync
> 
>   $ powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -mcpu=8540 -msoft-float -O2 -S -o- test.c | grep 
> sync
>   sync       <-- correct (TARGET_NO_LWSYNC already covers E500/8540)
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (TARGET_NO_LWSYNC): Add
>       PROCESSOR_MPCCORE.
> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> index 2d3016db5..a6ce0560f 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> @@ -533,9 +533,10 @@ extern int rs6000_vector_align[];
>                                || TARGET_VSX                           \
>                                || TARGET_HARD_FLOAT)
>  
> -/* E500 cores only support plain "sync", not lwsync.  */
> +/* E500 and MPC8xx cores only support plain "sync", not lwsync.  */
>  #define TARGET_NO_LWSYNC (rs6000_cpu == PROCESSOR_PPC8540 \
> -                       || rs6000_cpu == PROCESSOR_PPC8548)
> +                       || rs6000_cpu == PROCESSOR_PPC8548 \
> +                       || rs6000_cpu == PROCESSOR_MPCCORE)
>  
>  
>  /* Which machine supports the various reciprocal estimate instructions.  */

Reply via email to