On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan > <ramana....@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 13 Nov 2012, at 21:18, Konstantin Serebryany >> <konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This has broken the build on every Linux target that hasn't added >>>>> the necessary cpu specific code to asan_linux.cc >>>> >>>> This should be fixed by Dodji's recent patch. ASAN is not currently >>>> ported to any target other than x86/linux, so it should just be >>> >>> asan run-time (and the LLVM part) works on Mac and on ARM/Linux. >> >> And when you say ARM / Linux, has this been tested on older versions of the >> architecture or just v7-a ? > > And this arm is really arm32 and not ARM64 :).
Being an incorrigible pedant :) Technically the 32 bit and the 64 bit execution states are AArch32 and AArch64 as documented in the glossary on infocenter [1] . So if you are inventing a term to distinguish between the two I would prefer AArch32 rather than arm32 and arm64 because they don't come in any documentation neither in the compiler source nor in the documentation as it exists today - I do realize history and legacy have a part to play but if you want a new term ..... Regards, Ramana 1. http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.aeg0014e/ABCDEFGH.html
