On 16/11/12 15:35, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/14/2012 01:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Please please don't get into the habit of calling it ARM32 and ARM64,
you're just sowing confusion; there are good reasons why those names
weren't adopted (some technical, some not) and I'm not about to rehash
them all now. AArch32 and AArch64 aren't that much harder to type and
they are completely unambiguous.
And they can't be pronounced in any reasonable way. I think
you're going to lose this one.
I expect it's pronounced with a sort of throat-clearing noise that is
hard to write. Sort of like the gargling sound represented by "argh."
argh32 and argh64.
Ian
No, its pronounced Ay-Arch. It's not really hard to say, or think.
R.
