On 11/14/2012 01:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > Please please don't get into the habit of calling it ARM32 and ARM64, > you're just sowing confusion; there are good reasons why those names > weren't adopted (some technical, some not) and I'm not about to rehash > them all now. AArch32 and AArch64 aren't that much harder to type and > they are completely unambiguous.
And they can't be pronounced in any reasonable way. I think you're going to lose this one. Andrew
