On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/14/2012 01:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> Please please don't get into the habit of calling it ARM32 and ARM64, >> you're just sowing confusion; there are good reasons why those names >> weren't adopted (some technical, some not) and I'm not about to rehash >> them all now. AArch32 and AArch64 aren't that much harder to type and >> they are completely unambiguous. > > And they can't be pronounced in any reasonable way. I think > you're going to lose this one.
I expect it's pronounced with a sort of throat-clearing noise that is hard to write. Sort of like the gargling sound represented by "argh." argh32 and argh64. Ian
