> In, if it works. :-) Well, it does what it's supposed to do. Whether that's a "works" in the grand scheme of things is still debatable :-)
I'd still need to write testcases and a changelog, as I was posing it as a what-if-example so far. Also, we still don't guarantee proper operation in all cases if you change diagnostics after defining a function. That will have to wait until we have the single-int-location thing. Also, we never decided if "undo" was worth the extra overhead. The code is in the patch, but ifdef'd out. > URL, please? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01317.html
