DJ Delorie wrote:

> Also, we never decided if "undo" was worth the extra overhead.  The
> code is in the patch, but ifdef'd out.
> 
>> URL, please?
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01317.html

It looks to me like this probably isn't quite ready for prime-time; I do
think we'd want to make the push/pop stuff fully reliable, including
warnings emitted from the middle-end.  That's not an over-my-dead-body;
if other people feel differently, I'm happy to discuss.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713

Reply via email to