On 9/20/07, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Compilation works with *many* other compilers incl. all older, released g++, > Visual C++, and EDG-based compilers. And that does not make the code valid.
> I spent some time with Google and also looked here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html > But I couldn't find an indication that the new error is intentional. > Is it? Yes it is intentional. It is an extension of an already existing error with non templates. The code is invalid, though the C++ standard does make a mention, this does not have to be diagnostic. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
