On 9/20/07, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Pinski wrote: > > Yes it is intentional. It is an extension of an already existing > > error with non templates. The code is invalid, though the C++ > > standard does make a mention, this does not have to be diagnostic. > > Thanks for the quick reply! This is great, I like the change since it > enforces improved readability. However, I anticipate that many people > will have to make changes. Specifically, I have to go into the > Boost.Python sources. If people ask about my changes, it would help > if I could point them to some gcc resource. For example, could the > "Changes" page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html be updated > to mention the new error?
FYI, with -fpermissive gcc will accept the code. Richard.
