Andrew Pinski wrote: > Yes it is intentional. It is an extension of an already existing > error with non templates. The code is invalid, though the C++ > standard does make a mention, this does not have to be diagnostic.
Thanks for the quick reply! This is great, I like the change since it enforces improved readability. However, I anticipate that many people will have to make changes. Specifically, I have to go into the Boost.Python sources. If people ask about my changes, it would help if I could point them to some gcc resource. For example, could the "Changes" page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html be updated to mention the new error? Thanks! Ralf ____________________________________________________________________________________ Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
