Duncan Sands <baldr...@free.fr> writes: > this would work when doing unit-at-a-time, but not when doing > function-at-a-time. Does gcc still do function-at-a-time?
No. Ian
Duncan Sands <baldr...@free.fr> writes: > this would work when doing unit-at-a-time, but not when doing > function-at-a-time. Does gcc still do function-at-a-time?
No. Ian