On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 April 2010 22:28, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We had a patch tracking system, and it was completely ignored by most >> maintainers. > > But *submitters* did use it until it went down. So it was useful for > tracking unreviewed patches, not for improving reviewing. Right now, I > have no way to check what unreviewed patches there may be interesting > for me apart from searching the gcc-patches mailing list. Even the > psychological effect of having your patch tracked somewhere instead of > completely ignored would be effective. Perhaps more importantly, it > showed which parts of the compiler were more in need of further > reviewers. > > I think it was really bad that we lost the patch tracker.
You can use bugzilla, the patch keyword and the URL field to track patches for bugs. Richard. > Cheers, > > Manuel. >
