On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 09:56 +0100, Paulo Matos wrote: > Hello, > > Apologies for the delay on the update. It was my plan to do an update > on > a monthly basis but it slipped by a couple of weeks.
Thanks for working on this. > The current status is: > > *Workers:* [...snip...] > *Builds:* [...snip...] Looking at some of the red blobs in e.g. the grid view there seem to be a few failures in the initial "update gcc trunk repo" step of the form: svn: Working copy '.' locked svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for details) https://gcc-lnt.linki.tools/#/builders/3/builds/388/steps/0/logs/stdio Is there a bug-tracking location for the buildbot? Presumably: https://github.com/LinkiTools/gcc-buildbot/issues ? *Reporters:* > > There is a single reporter which is a irc bot currently silent. > > *Regression analysis:* > > This is one of the most important issues to tackle and I have a > solution > in a branch regression-testing : > https://github.com/LinkiTools/gcc-buildbot/tree/regression-testing > > using jamais-vu from David Malcolm to analyze the regressions. > It needs some more testing and I should be able to get it working > still > this year. I actually found a serious bug in jamais-vu yesterday - it got confused by multiple .sum lines for the same source line e.g. from multiple "dg-" directives that all specify a particular line). For example, when testing one of my patches, of the 3 tests reporting as "c-c++-common/pr83059.c -std=c++11 (test for warnings, line 7)" one of the 3 PASS results became a FAIL. jv correctly reported that new FAILs had occurred, but wouldn't identify them, and mistakenly reported that new PASSes has occurred also. I've fixed that now; to do so I've done some refactoring and added a testsuite. It looks like you're capturing the textual output from "jv compare" and using the exit code. Would you prefer to import "jv" as a python module and use some kind of API? Or a different output format? If you file pull request(s) for the changes you've made in your copy of jamais-vu, I can take at look at merging them. [...] > I hope to send another update in about a months time. > > Kind regards, Thanks again for your work on this Dave
