gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Introduction and Interest in GSOC 2025 Martin Jambor
• feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: feature request: a linker option to avoid merging variables from separate object files into shared cache lines Mateusz Guzik via Gcc
• [no subject] gg g via Gcc
• [no subject] Tzxstiy via Gcc
• Sourceware forge experiment Mark Wielaard
  • Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Automatic URLs in forgejo? (was Re: Sourceware forge experiment) Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Sourceware forge experiment Mark Wielaard
• gcc-15-20241020 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Question about http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic Olive Clinton via Gcc
• [no subject] Emiliano Soares via Gcc
• gcc-14-20241019 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20241018 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Douglas McIlroy via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Douglas McIlroy via Gcc
  • Re: BUG: realloc(p,0) is not conforming to C99/C11/C17/POSIX.1-2008 Jason Merrill via Gcc
• [RFC][AArch64] Defining lrotm3 optabs for SVE modes for TARGET_SVE2? Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC][AArch64] Defining lrotm3 optabs for SVE modes for TARGET_SVE2? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC][AArch64] Defining lrotm3 optabs for SVE modes for TARGET_SVE2? Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
• Alex Coplan appointed maintainer of AArch64 pair fusion pass and pair-fusion pass. Ramana Radhakrishnan via Gcc
  • Re: Alex Coplan appointed maintainer of AArch64 pair fusion pass and pair-fusion pass. Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: Alex Coplan appointed maintainer of AArch64 pair fusion pass and pair-fusion pass. Alex Coplan via Gcc
• How to remove extra assembly code Ericxu833--- via Gcc
  • Re: How to remove extra assembly code Nick Clifton via Gcc
  • Re: How to remove extra assembly code LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: How to remove extra assembly code" LIU Hao via Gcc
• gcc14.2 gprbuild not provided Berger, Lutz via Gcc
  • Re: gcc14.2 gprbuild not provided Marc Poulhiès via Gcc
• Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Eric Gallager via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Is -Wtraditional obsolete? Richard Biener via Gcc
• Linaro CI new feature: skip precommit testing Christophe Lyon via Gcc
• C23 status on cppreference Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Florian Weimer
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Florian Weimer
  • Re: C23 status on cppreference Joseph Myers via Gcc
• C Standard Libraries Bryon Quackenbush via Gcc
  • Re: C Standard Libraries Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
  • Re: C Standard Libraries Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Andrew Stubbs
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • Re: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Andrew Stubbs
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
  • RE: [RFC] Enabling SVE with offloading to nvptx Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
• GCC 15.0.0 Status Report (2024-10-14), Stage 1 ends Nov 17th Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-15-20241013 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20241012 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20241011 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Android: Fix build for Android yxj-github-437 via Gcc
  • Re: Android: Fix build for Android Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• c99 does not handle -O2 but cc does? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
  • Re: c99 does not handle -O2 but cc does? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: c99 does not handle -O2 but cc does? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
• Suggest: Add curl to gcc/install/prerequisites Roosh Fourtytwo via Gcc
  • Re: Suggest: Add curl to gcc/install/prerequisites Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Suggest: Add curl to gcc/install/prerequisites Roosh Fourtytwo via Gcc
• gcc-12-20241010 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office Friday 16:00 UTC, A forge experiment? Mark Wielaard
• [no subject] Zhang Zhang via Gcc
• Educational question on compiling (analyzing) the C programming language Laurent Cimon via Gcc
  • Re: Educational question on compiling (analyzing) the C programming language Florian Weimer
  • Re: Educational question on compiling (analyzing) the C programming language Andreas Schwab via Gcc
• Why are profile-implied niters capped at 99? Alex Coplan via Gcc
• gcc-15-20241006 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20241005 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20241004 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Assembly-level peepholes? Sid Maxwell via Gcc
  • Re: Assembly-level peepholes? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Assembly-level peepholes? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
• gcc-12-20241003 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Joseph Myers via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Florian Weimer
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Paul Eggert
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Florian Weimer
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Qing Zhao via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Qing Zhao via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Qing Zhao via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: Handling C2Y zero-length operations on null pointers Chris Bazley via Gcc
• Where does this dead statement generated in switch conversion come from? Filip Kastl
  • Re: Where does this dead statement generated in switch conversion come from? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Where does this dead statement generated in switch conversion come from? Filip Kastl
• n3365 New _Lengthof operator (v4) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • n3369 New _Lengthof operator (v4) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: n3369 New _Lengthof operator (v4) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Georg-Johann Lay
  • RE: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Tamar Christina via Gcc
  • Re: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Georg-Johann Lay
  • RE: Understanding bogus? gcc.dg/signbit-6.c Tamar Christina via Gcc
• How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Matthias Kretz via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Andi Kleen via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: How to debug/improve excessive compiler memory usage and compile times Richard Biener via Gcc
• GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? James K. Lowden
  • GCC (GNU Toolchain) devroom at FOSDEM 2025! (was: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025?) Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? James K. Lowden
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2025? Marc Poulhiès via Gcc
• Sourceware infrastructure updates for Q3 2024 Mark Wielaard
• Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus appointed s390x port co-maintainer David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus appointed s390x port co-maintainer Andreas Krebbel via Gcc
• RFC: Update FSF (physical) mail address - in various files (COPYING, *.texi, ...) Tobias Burnus
  • Re: RFC: Update FSF (physical) mail address - in various files (COPYING, *.texi, ...) Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• gcc-15-20240929 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20240928 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Global Module Implications of extern "C/C++", or Partition python Dashboard server admanager.resources via Gcc
• gcc-13-20240927 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? David Brown via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
  • Re: Is there a need to sometimes change gcc/config/t-* files when building a cross compiler? Dennis Luehring via Gcc
• gcc-12-20240926 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Meaning of flag_pic Enrico via Gcc
  • Re: Meaning of flag_pic Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Meaning of flag_pic Enrico via Gcc
• Christophe Lyon as MVE reviewer for the AArch32 (arm) port. Ramana Radhakrishnan
  • Re: Christophe Lyon as MVE reviewer for the AArch32 (arm) port. Christophe Lyon via Gcc
  • Re: Christophe Lyon as MVE reviewer for the AArch32 (arm) port. Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
• The riscv compilation chain for your own operating system cannot recognize march. Troy Mitchell via Gcc
  • Re: The riscv compilation chain for your own operating system cannot recognize march. Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: The riscv compilation chain for your own operating system cannot recognize march. Troy via Gcc
  • Re: The riscv compilation chain for your own operating system cannot recognize march. Kai Ruottu via Gcc
• Canceled event with note: Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain @ Thu Dec 26, 2024 11am - 12pm (EST) (gcc@gcc.gnu.org) Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• GCC Doxygen documentation Bryon Quackenbush via Gcc
  • Re: GCC Doxygen documentation David Malcolm via Gcc
• spelling of `side effects` vs `side-effects` Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: spelling of `side effects` vs `side-effects` David Brown via Gcc
• GCC 14.2: Configuring with zstd support Paul Smith via Gcc
• GCC nvptx-none Target Testing (was: New page "nvptx" in the GCC wiki to document --target=nvptx-none configurations) Thomas Schwinge
  • RE: GCC nvptx-none Target Testing (was: New page "nvptx" in the GCC wiki to document --target=nvptx-none configurations) Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
• Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-09-26 at 11am EST5EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• [PATCH] Update email in MAINTAINERS file. Aldy Hernandez via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH] Update email in MAINTAINERS file. Filip Kastl

• Earlier messages
• Later messages