Adam wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Pack it in, I knew you wouldn't be able to resist arguing the toss at >>> every occation, but breaking every download link on a whim is just too >>> much. >> I haven't "broken every download link". > > It is true that some links are broken - for instance, the link to > "Library Downloads" at the bottom of > http://www.riscos.info/index.php/UNIX_Libraries > ...though I haven't checked this in a long time, so am not sure if it's a > recent thing or not. > > I don't know the details but presumably the equivalent page is now: > http://www.riscos.info/packages/ABCIndex.html ?
There's clearly work in progress here, and there is no pretense that what we have is a complete and satisfactory solution. Certainly what was in place beforehand wasn't. There clearly are broken links, but we'll work to fix those ASAP. I don't have any real reason to believe that the very dated libraries I had in place were in use by anyone. What Alan has done with packaging them is much more useful. > I'm not sure that I feel that happy about people being removed from the > list for expressing their view (be it annoying/rude or not). > I don't like it either, but there's a world of difference between expressing opinions on things which have happened (your response here) and starting out with vindictive and overweening accusations based upon things which are far from accurate. Ironically, it's just such views that druck has been highly critical of on usenet. If he wants to vent his spleen over something which could have been resolved with a simple email, then he can do it elsewhere. Ultimately, I can't contribute in such an environment, and I'm confident that whatever I do, not everyone is going to agree. As much is true almost every OSS project involving more than one person. Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote: > In the meantime can I ask that the (reportedly) removed person be > reinstated. > At such time he agrees to behave in a more becoming manner, certainly. _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
