Adam wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Peter Naulls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] >> Alan + Adam - you should be able to build Firefox and Gnash as is >> (mostly likely you don't have my dilemma) - care to try? > > I've just tried firefox again (on NTFS), with an unsuccessful result.[1] > However, I think I'm not up to date with some changes you made - for > instance you mentioned a new symlink and explicit run of install-env.
Please don't ;-( Both you and Alan reported this failure days after it was already fixed. The changes I made weren't just for fun; they were explicitly to address issues you knew I was working to resolve with cygwin. I think you're both on the commits mailing list, so you should have been aware at least that there was _some_ changes. _Unless_ you have the very latest changes from the autobuilder and porting tools, I must insist that you don't report bugs. That's not a good use of anyone's time. > [1] I did solve one odd thing - the zip binary wasn't being found for > some reason and causing builds to fail. I automade "native-zip" which > seems to have solved that problem at least. That's not a solution, not at all. The native-zip is an implicit dependency, and is supposed to always be built. Certainly there was a bug whereby it wasn't, but that was over a month ago. If it's in fact still not, then we need to find out why, not gloss over it. That's true of anything in the autobuilder. _______________________________________________ GCCSDK mailing list [email protected] Bugzilla: http://www.riscos.info/bugzilla/index.cgi List Info: http://www.riscos.info/mailman/listinfo/gcc Main Page: http://www.riscos.info/index.php/GCCSDK
