That sounds good to me. Best regards,
Tamas 2014-03-25 22:37 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > GDAL 1.10 was released about one year ago, so it is time to think about > the next > release. I think we should just call it 1.11 given that there are no major > architectural changes (although there have been non trivial changes in RAT > management and for multiple geometry field support, but that only impacts > core & > drivers), and the C API and ABI is still preserved (for those who have > looked at > the other thread, my experiments on unification are *not* in trunk). For > the > details, I have initiated the preliminary NEWS : > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/export/27091/trunk/gdal/NEWS (*) > There are some mentions to 2.0 in the documentation of new features, but > I'll > end up fixing them to reflect the 1.11 numbering. > > I think we are in a good shape to start the beta phase soon. If people have > features or bug fixes almost ready that they'd like to be in 1.11, please > speak > up now. Otherwise I suggest issuing a beta-1 at the end of next week, give > it a > week for testing, and depending on the outcome, issue a beta-2, or just try > RC-1. Unless someone volunteers (the process is fairly well documented in > HOWTO-RELEASE), I can be release manager for 1.11. > > Any opinion about that plan ? > > Best regards, > > Even > > -- > Geospatial professional services > http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
