I think you should take a look at what cppcheck finds when scanning GDAL source before the next release. There are a few tens of small errors. Mostly, small leaks in particalr cases. Not very important errors, but that ought to be fixed before doing an release in my opinion
2014-03-26 8:49 GMT+01:00 Paul Meems <[email protected]>: > +1 for adding VS2013 binaries in GISInternals > > Thanks, > > Paul > > *Paul Meems * > Release manager, configuration manager > and forum moderator of MapWindow GIS. > www.mapwindow.org > > Owner of MapWindow.nl - Support for > Dutch speaking users. > www.mapwindow.nl > > > > *Join us at the MapWindow GIS Conference 2014 > <http://geogis.detek.unideb.hu/TKonferencia/2014/>, in Debrecen Hungary* > > > 2014-03-26 6:25 GMT+01:00 xavier lhomme <[email protected]>: > > Hi >> Adding Visual Studio 2012 2013 in GISInternals for Gdal 1.11 should be >> great too. >> Xav >> Le 25 mars 2014 22:57, "Tamas Szekeres" <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> That sounds good to me. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Tamas >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-25 22:37 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> GDAL 1.10 was released about one year ago, so it is time to think about >>>> the next >>>> release. I think we should just call it 1.11 given that there are no >>>> major >>>> architectural changes (although there have been non trivial changes in >>>> RAT >>>> management and for multiple geometry field support, but that only >>>> impacts core & >>>> drivers), and the C API and ABI is still preserved (for those who have >>>> looked at >>>> the other thread, my experiments on unification are *not* in trunk). >>>> For the >>>> details, I have initiated the preliminary NEWS : >>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/export/27091/trunk/gdal/NEWS (*) >>>> There are some mentions to 2.0 in the documentation of new features, >>>> but I'll >>>> end up fixing them to reflect the 1.11 numbering. >>>> >>>> I think we are in a good shape to start the beta phase soon. If people >>>> have >>>> features or bug fixes almost ready that they'd like to be in 1.11, >>>> please speak >>>> up now. Otherwise I suggest issuing a beta-1 at the end of next week, >>>> give it a >>>> week for testing, and depending on the outcome, issue a beta-2, or just >>>> try >>>> RC-1. Unless someone volunteers (the process is fairly well documented >>>> in >>>> HOWTO-RELEASE), I can be release manager for 1.11. >>>> >>>> Any opinion about that plan ? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Even >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Geospatial professional services >>>> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> gdal-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gdal-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > -- [image: Geovariances] Olivier BARTHELEMY *Software development engineer* Geovariances, 49bis avenue Franklin Roosevelt - 77215 AVON CEDEX - FRANCE | www.geovariances.com <http://link.geovariances.com/eml-home> Keep posted about Geovariances <http://link.geovariances.com/eml-geowidget> <http://link.geovariances.com/eml-linkedin-gv> <http://link.geovariances.com/eml-linkedin> <http://link.geovariances.com/eml-twitter> <http://link.geovariances.com/eml-youtube> <http://link.geovariances.com/eml-slideshare>
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
