Good plan!
Best regards,
Dmitry
26.03.2014 1:57, Tamas Szekeres ?????:
That sounds good to me.
Best regards,
Tamas
2014-03-25 22:37 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hi,
GDAL 1.10 was released about one year ago, so it is time to think
about the next
release. I think we should just call it 1.11 given that there are
no major
architectural changes (although there have been non trivial
changes in RAT
management and for multiple geometry field support, but that only
impacts core &
drivers), and the C API and ABI is still preserved (for those who
have looked at
the other thread, my experiments on unification are *not* in
trunk). For the
details, I have initiated the preliminary NEWS :
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/export/27091/trunk/gdal/NEWS (*)
There are some mentions to 2.0 in the documentation of new
features, but I'll
end up fixing them to reflect the 1.11 numbering.
I think we are in a good shape to start the beta phase soon. If
people have
features or bug fixes almost ready that they'd like to be in 1.11,
please speak
up now. Otherwise I suggest issuing a beta-1 at the end of next
week, give it a
week for testing, and depending on the outcome, issue a beta-2, or
just try
RC-1. Unless someone volunteers (the process is fairly well
documented in
HOWTO-RELEASE), I can be release manager for 1.11.
Any opinion about that plan ?
Best regards,
Even
--
Geospatial professional services
http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
