Hi, Adding VS2012/VS2013 support in GISInternals is a separate action (not included in the release plan).
In fact I'm not keen to add further build instances to the current build server installation which has a pretty limited set of resources. However I've got a promise to have a new VM on a blade, which will be sufficient to set up the new environment including further build instances. Best regards, Tamas 2014-03-26 6:25 GMT+01:00 xavier lhomme <[email protected]>: > Hi > Adding Visual Studio 2012 2013 in GISInternals for Gdal 1.11 should be > great too. > Xav > Le 25 mars 2014 22:57, "Tamas Szekeres" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > That sounds good to me. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tamas >> >> >> >> 2014-03-25 22:37 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> GDAL 1.10 was released about one year ago, so it is time to think about >>> the next >>> release. I think we should just call it 1.11 given that there are no >>> major >>> architectural changes (although there have been non trivial changes in >>> RAT >>> management and for multiple geometry field support, but that only >>> impacts core & >>> drivers), and the C API and ABI is still preserved (for those who have >>> looked at >>> the other thread, my experiments on unification are *not* in trunk). For >>> the >>> details, I have initiated the preliminary NEWS : >>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/export/27091/trunk/gdal/NEWS (*) >>> There are some mentions to 2.0 in the documentation of new features, but >>> I'll >>> end up fixing them to reflect the 1.11 numbering. >>> >>> I think we are in a good shape to start the beta phase soon. If people >>> have >>> features or bug fixes almost ready that they'd like to be in 1.11, >>> please speak >>> up now. Otherwise I suggest issuing a beta-1 at the end of next week, >>> give it a >>> week for testing, and depending on the outcome, issue a beta-2, or just >>> try >>> RC-1. Unless someone volunteers (the process is fairly well documented in >>> HOWTO-RELEASE), I can be release manager for 1.11. >>> >>> Any opinion about that plan ? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Even >>> >>> -- >>> Geospatial professional services >>> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gdal-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
