There's a lot of code to work on. Would it make sense just to make a C++11 branch and get to work, merging into master whenever it seems the right time?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 January 2017 at 02:57, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> writes: > > > > If no other packages start to depend on unreleased GDAL, and the first > > GDAL release requiring C++11 is a ways off, and by then enough other > > things require it that a system not having a C++11 compiler is totally > > non-viable, then this shouldn't cause problems for pkgsrc. > > > > FYI - the upcoming QGIS 3.0 release has a hard c++11 requirement. Not > sure how much that affects things, but certainly projects which > utilise GDAL are already switching to c++11. > > Nyall > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > -- Andrew Bell [email protected]
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
