To follow on to Howard's comment about testing in python... I'm looking forward to the day that GDAL can drop all python 2.x support and testing!
And anyone working on C++ testing is welcome to the code here. I'll happily donate it with a license change to GDAL (it's apache 2.0 right now). You are free refactor however. Or just use any bits that you think are helpful if going to a different testing library. I can also donate some of the 80+k files in my fuzzer corpus as test inputs that cover weird corners of the code. https://github.com/schwehr/gdal-autotest2/tree/master/cpp On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:39 AM Howard Butler <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > I watched the ticket traffic and shuddered :) Thank you. GDAL's testing > probably predates five or six Python testing regimes/eras. I also have > the concern about GDAL's testing going through Python, but this RFC will > make it much easier for people to contribute and improve the story. > > > Congratulations on a huge lift! > > > Howard > > > On 12/9/18 9:48 PM, Kurt Schwehr wrote: > > I haven't had a chance to read the RFC yet, so I can't yet vote. > However, > > a huge thank you to Craig and everyone else who put in effort to make > this > > happen! > > > > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 7:05 PM Craig de Stigter < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Jonathan > >> > >>> it's worth spending a little thought on coming up with a scheme for > >> test-ids. > >> > >> I've been through the list of parametrized tests and tweaked the `ids` > >> kwargs to make them a little more helpful at first glance: > >> > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/963/commits/8db599e7bc08b7dc73d81591898ed0f5f4243a58 > >> > >> I didn't see any way to use `pytest_make_parametrize_id` really; IDs > >> rightly vary enough between tests that I can't see that hook being very > >> useful here. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Craig de Stigter > >> > >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 09:59 jratike80 < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +0 > >>> > >>> -Jukka Rahkonen- > >>> > >>> > >>> Even Rouault-2 wrote > >>>> PSC members, > >>>> > >>>> gentle reminder to cast your vote on this. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Even > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-Dev-f3742093.html > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> gdal-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gdal-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gdal-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- -- http://schwehr.org
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
