Hi, I've a PR ready that might be a bit controversial among contributors as it effectively "bans" a well-defined behaviour of C/C++, that is underflow/ overflow on unsigned integer arithmetic. However there are potential for real bugs to be hidden by such a behaviour (I or other contributors fixed a few instances of that in a few previous commits), so it seems reasonable to try to avoid it when possible, and when not possible, to tag the functions where this is explicitly allowed with CPL_NOSANITIZE_UNSIGNED_INT_OVERFLOW
See https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/1782 Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
