Is this just on when running tests? On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:28 PM Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've a PR ready that might be a bit controversial among contributors as it > effectively "bans" a well-defined behaviour of C/C++, that is underflow/ > overflow on unsigned integer arithmetic. However there are potential for > real > bugs to be hidden by such a behaviour (I or other contributors fixed a few > instances of that in a few previous commits), so it seems reasonable to > try to > avoid it when possible, and when not possible, to tag the functions where > this > is explicitly allowed with CPL_NOSANITIZE_UNSIGNED_INT_OVERFLOW > > See > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/1782 > > Even > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Andrew Bell [email protected]
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
