> Isn't LGPL a good way for many of us make our symbols/footprints > available?
LGPL, if it applies at all, would require that anyone receiving a copy of the Work be able to replace the lgpl'd portions with modified versions. That just doesn't work with circuit boards. Maybe it would work with schematics and .pcb files, since it's "easy" to extract and/or replace symbols/footprints. Remember, we're not dealing with code here, we're dealing with data. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
