Bernd, As I stated earlier, I am just asking for clarity on what I can do with various symbols and landpatterns. I had reached the conclussion that the only safe thing for me to do was to use 100% of my own symbols and such.
I again am thankfull that Stuart is working to clarify the situation and I also think that symbols which were contributed to the project under even the belief that they were GPL and that this extends through to the final board should be respected. I don't know how difficult it would be to sort the existing symbols into those that Stuart's exception would apply to and those that are unknown or specifically excluded from Stuart's exception. I do feel that this is an issue that makes the project less atractive to a number of users. Thanks, Steve Meier On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 20:49 +0200, Bernd Jendrissek wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:27:12AM -0800, Steve Meier wrote: > > Which symbols have you donated? I would like to know so that I can > > make double sure to avoid them. > > Watched the Poisonous People talk, have you? > > Don't worry, you can rest assured that there are no symbols with my > poisonous mark on them floating around. > > - -- > Your Mom is so dumb that she tried to minimize a 12 > variable function to a minimal sum of products expression using a > karnaugh map instead of the Quine-McCluskey Algorithm. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFF+uapwyMv24BBd/gRAvcEAJ0bZVIgQVG13EURwH7eVnqFdd85LwCeK5aL > Hztwf5bLPHLP/Rv+lD9R/ps= > =ZW40 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
