On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 10:19 +0000, Peter TB Brett wrote: > On Thursday 08 November 2007 08:05, Peter TB Brett wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 17:11:38 Werner Hoch wrote: > > > > If so, that's bad and shouldn't be happening -- the symbol data's > > > > supposed to be cached. > > > > > > gschem calls my script over and over again. > > > > Could you file a bug & assign it to me? I promise to look into it > > (probably not for a week or two, I'm going to be over at MIT this weekend > > and then desperately trying to catch up with work). > > On second thoughts, this might not actually *be* a bug. Consider the case > that you edit the database while editing a schematic -- you probably wouldn't > want to have to close gschem and re-open it in order to make your changes > visible to gschem. > > I'm not sure what the best behaviour would be. Any suggestions?
I guess that depends on the cost / availability of a query. HTTP servers will tell the client how long (if at all) they may cache content for, and there are mechanisms to query if something has been modified since a particular data/time. This partly transfers to symbols, if we have a HTTP backend. Must go now... fire drill, and ought to log out before I leave the PC. Peter C. _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
